According to the identification card's estimation, the person who made this footprint should be a boy between the ages of 8 and 12.
Right in front of him was a suitable candidate, Pek.
Pek originally lived in the same house as the victim, so his presence at the crime scene was not a problem.
But the problem was, why would he wear adult shoes, and leave behind bloody footprints.
Luke had observed that he had his own shoes, so the possibility of not having shoes to wear was out of the question.
Moreover, if he really wore the wrong shoes, there should have been bloodstained shoes found at the scene, but the technical team did not find any.
This meant that Pek had thrown away the shoes that left the bloody footprints.
He was deliberately falsifying the crime scene.
Putting himself in that position, Luke wondered why Pek would want to fake an adult's bloody footprints?
He wanted to prove an adult had been there.
