As a cool and aloof academic prodigy, Ren Zhong always had a strong drive to act.
Otherwise, back then he wouldn't have been able to withstand so many temptations on one side, while excelling in his studies.
Often, when he felt something was necessary to do, he would ensure it was done, and as quickly as possible.
For example, that fraudster who sold a broken gun and then beat the boy to death when he tried to get his money back and seek justice.
Last night, Ren Zhong had a momentary urge to kill.
But he didn't rush to act yesterday.
He was actually considering it.
Logically speaking, that person did not have the opportunity to commit evil this time.
So, should such a person pay for the sins he would have committed but didn't?
This is an unsolvable paradox.
Having grown up in the 21st century, although Ren Zhong intended to change and integrate into the era, there were still traces of a law-based society lingering within him.
