The remaining confrontations required a similarly satisfying and meticulous unfolding of events, didn't they?
That kind of collective understanding, which seemed as if it would be accepted by others, was supposed to be embraced from the very beginning.
The myriad other issues that consequently emerged as unacceptable, were addressed in detail, resulting in a more satisfying and meticulous resolution.
This, in turn, allowed for a clear understanding of everything that could be initiated in response to the events.
It was almost entirely unnecessary, therefore, to adopt a perception that appeared to be more widely accepted and satisfying.
Thus, thoughts that seemed agreeable and satisfactory to others followed.
The understanding that could be reached in response to events already possessed a shared acceptance.
Any other special confrontations, therefore, no longer required a careful understanding or detailed development of the issues.
